From the desk of Nuvira Technologies

A broken Nippur lament in two pieces

A reading, published with its checks still open. A Vigslist translation.

October 22, 2026 · N 3338 + N 3380

A broken Nippur lament in two pieces. Two fragments of one lament.

Published as a reading. No first-translation claim is made for this piece. The checks that would settle such a claim are named in the notes below and are still open; the wording on this page claims nothing they have not settled.

Museum numbers: N 3338 + N 3380 — two joined fragments, University of Pennsylvania Museum, from Nippur. Old Babylonian. Corpus ID: CDLI P278417; served to OBEL (Old Babylonian Emesal Liturgies), genre "Inana-Dumuzi." No composition is identified: no incipit, deity's name, or rubric survives in what is preserved — a bird simile, a galla-demon comparison, a forsaking, a bundle, a shield, and water, in lines broken at both ends. Source: OBEL's served interlinear text, fetched and saved by Wave C (). OBEL serves no translation. the witness, doors on the face below. Counting rule used here: a line counts part if a complete verb form or a glossed phrase survives; fragment if only isolated words or traces survive; whole only if a complete clause survives intact. No line counts whole.

Publication check (C3, Oct 22): no edition, translation, or discussion of N 3338 or N 3380 found in the program's tree or in open search under either number or CDLI P278417. Nippur's OB literary tablets in this number range are largely unpublished museum pieces; that is the standing fact of the N-collection, stated here as the door it is. Doors left on the face: (1) Delnero, SANER 26 (catalogue eyeball outstanding, print-check wave). (2) CDLI's record (P278417) — unread; CDLI is still down. (3) Peterson's unpublished Nippur work — the standing unknown for all OBEL N-material; a drawer rendering would be credited, not a bar.

Dragon/serpent flag: none. The only animal on the tablet is a bird (mušen, o 5′) — a simile, not a serpent word. The galla of o 7′ is the "policeman"-demon of the gloss, named as the gloss names it.

The witness reading

o 1′: [... ] x [... ] [...] (a trace) [...]

o 2′: [... ] ki [... ] [...] the place [...]

o 3′: [... ]-⸢ne⸣-eš₂ ⸢mu⸣ [... ] x [... ] [...] (traces) [...]

o 4′: [... ] a / min [x] ba-an-⸢ta⸣-[... ] [...] water, two(?) [...]

o 5′: [... ] igi-ŋu₁₀-⸢ta?⸣ x mušen-gin₇ a₂ ba-[...-dub₂ / sud?] [...] from my face [...] like a bird, the arm [...]

o 6′: [... ] x šu-še₃ [x]-⸢ba?⸣ me-a ba-ni-⸢in?⸣-[... ] [...] to the hand [...] where? [...]

o 7′: [... ] ⸢gal₅⸣-la₂-gin₇ [x] mu-un-gi[...] / a-ba [mu]-un-na-⸢ab⸣-[... ] [...] like a galla-demon [...] he turned [...] who [...]

o 8′: [... ] ⸢ma?⸣-al-e [x]-ri-ŋa₂? maš₂-e [... ] [...] the goat [...]

o 9′: [... ] ⸢ba?-da?-bu⸣-bu-⸢re⸣ [... ] [...] tearing away [...]

o 10′: [... ] ⸢na⸣-me-a lu₂? x [... ] [...] anyone(?) — a person [...]

o 11′: [... ] x-⸢da?⸣-[... ] [...] (traces) [...]

r 1′: [... ] x [... ] [...] (a trace) [...]

r 2′: [... ] ma₂ um-⸢bur₂?⸣-e x [... ] [...] the ship [...] loosens(?) [...]

r 3′: [... ] ba-an?-ga! / ŋal₂! guru₂₁ [... ] [...] the shield [...]

r 4′: [... ] a? na-am₂-ge₁₆-le-ŋa₂ x [... ] [...] water(?) [...] he forsakes [...]

r 5′: [... ] ma₂-da-la₂-ŋu₁₀ ba-[... ] [...] my bundle [...]

r 6′: [... ] KU bar-⸢ŋa₂?⸣ a ba-an-[... ] [...] outside [...] water [...]

r 7′: [... ] x ZI mu x x [... ] [...] (unglossed traces) [...]

r 8′: [... ] ⸢ki?⸣-ru ŋal₂ [x]-x [...] it is [...]

r 9′: [... ] x [... ] [...] (a trace) [...]

Count

20 served line-units: 0 whole · 5 part · 15 fragment · 0 invented. The part-lines are the bird simile (o 5′), the "where?" line (o 6′), the galla comparison (o 7′), the tearing line (o 9′), and the forsaking line (r 4′).

What this witness is

Twenty line-ends of a lament whose middle is gone. A face, a bird, a hand, a demon to be compared against, a ship, a shield, a bundle — the props of a Dumuzi-circle lament, filed by the corpus under Inana-Dumuzi, with the one complete gesture the fragment keeps: he forsakes. Whose face, whose bundle, the broken lines held. The reading holds no more than the clay does.

Nuvira Technologies conducts this research with AI assistance, cross-verified against the primary sources to scholarly integrity standards. Uncertain readings are marked; broken lines are left broken.

— Richard Vigslist, Founder, Nuvira Technologies


More antiquities research: Antiquities Research

← Back to Nuvira Technologies